Codes Executive Group
Purpose
The purpose of the Group is to govern the Regulations and Code of Practice for Taught Programmes and the Regulations and Code of Practice for Research Degree Programmes, specifically by:
- Supporting strategic educational development through according regulatory and policy change;
- Undertaking any discrete regulatory and policy development where a substantial issue relating to academic standards has been raised and/or there is a significant risk of non-compliance;
- Ensuring that the Codes are accessible and mitigate against risk to enable activity.
Terms of Reference
- To develop the regulatory basis to support different University strategic initiatives: each initiative will determine the principle or intention and the executive group will subsequently translate those intentions and present them in a proposed set of new or revised regulations and/or policy.
- To consider discrete clarifications and updates by reviewing existing, or developing new, policy, as directed by AQC (to assure academic standards) or ULEC/UPGRC (to regulate and enable new activity) - although this should be prioritised and limited to enable (a) above.
- To oversee the content and presentation of the Codes to ensure that they are accessible (e.g. process is extricated from policy) and in line with the recommendations from the Governance Review.
‘Minor’ revision (e.g. where the intention of a clause is unchanged) will be managed and enacted, outside of this governance, by AQPO.
Consultation and approval
Following initial consideration by the Group, proposals setting out the direction of travel for the identified issues will be presented to ULEC, UPGRC and professional service leads for discussion and agreement. The actual revisions to the Codes will then be drafted.
A Green Paper may be presented to Senate for its view where fundamental changes to the principles that underpin the Code/s are being considered or proposed.
The proposed changes to the Codes will be presented to the UAQC in May and University Education Committee in June for approval.
Mode of operation
- The Group will report to the University Academic Quality Committee.
- The Group will meet as required, consonant with its work plan, to discuss any matters of substance; it may virtually consider and agree moderate changes to existing policy or regulation.
- The Group will liaise specifically with professional service divisions (e.g. the Secretary’s Office) as appropriate, depending upon the issues being considered.
The schedule of business will be identified at the start of each academic year in liaison with UAQC, ULEC and UPGRC and approved by the Chairs of these committees
Membership - for 2025/26
Capacity | Member |
---|---|
Policy advisors from AQPO | Mike White (Chair) and Chris Walker |
Academic representative covering UG and PGT programmes - from the Faculty of Arts, Law and Social Sciences | Dr James Freeman |
Academic representative covering UG and PGT programmes - from the Faculty of Health and Life Sciences | Dr Peter Brennan |
Academic representative covering UG and PGT programmes - from the Faculty of Science and Engineering | Dr Chris Russell |
Academic representative covering PGR programmes | Dr Rebecca Richardson |
A Head of Faculty Education and Student Success | Ben Harrison |
Education Process Improvement Manager | Alarna Samarasinghe |
Head of Assessment | Dr Charlotte Verney |