Titled ‘Treaties, Brexit, and the Constitution’, the submission to the House of Lords Liasison Committee ‘Review of Investigative and Scrutiny Committees’ Inquiry is based on a conference co-organised by Dr Eirik Bjorge, Arabella Lang and Dr Ewan Smith, held on 23 March 2018 at Jesus College, University of Oxford.
During the conference, practitioners, academics, judges, and lawyers from the Houses of Parliament and the Foreign & Commonwealth Office set out to examine UK law on treaties and offer realistic recommendations on constitutional settlement for parliamentarians.
The paper sums up the conclusions of the conference discussions, outlining potential problems that the renegotiating of international treaties upon leaving the EU could present, and evaluating parliamentary sovereignty and Committees’ conceivable future role in scrutinising such treaties.
It includes several case studies, recommendations for enhancing democratic accountability and suggestions for new mechanisms for parliamentary scrutiny, proposing the creation of a new Joint Treaty Committee, with a specialised Treaty Secretariat to “support committees by monitoring, analysing and advising on proposed treaties.”
The submission concludes:
“in our view the most important thing is that Parliament is aware of the treaty issues of Brexit, and seriously considers options for democratic scrutiny of treaties to replace and perhaps expand on those that will be lost with Brexit.”
To read the written evidence ‘Treaties, Brexit and the Constitution’ in full online please click here.