Protecting Vulnerable Tenants: reforming the law on protection from eviction

We welcome the Renters’ Rights Bill and the rights and protections it provides for renters, but, if the most vulnerable renters are to be properly protected, reform is also needed to the outdated, complex, and difficult to enforce law on illegal eviction and harassment.

The Protection from Eviction Act 1977 (the Act) is the source of current protections. Conditions in the private rented sector have changed dramatically since the Act was enacted 50 years ago. This briefing proposes amendments to the Act, as well as the Housing and Planning Act 2016, to modernise the law ensuring it is fit for purpose.

Reform is necessary because: 

  • The law on illegal eviction provides a floor of rights for the most vulnerable renters, including those who struggle with literacy or for whom English is not a first language. The law must be effective and easy to enforce so they can claim their rights and can be properly protected.
  • Illegal evictions break down trust in society and lead to extraordinary social costs, as education, employment and health care are disrupted, and local authorities are faced with escalating costs in providing accommodation for the homeless.
  • Local authorities are responsible for enforcing the law and can struggle with its complexity, including challenging evidential requirements like gathering witness evidence from victims and ensuring they take part in the prosecution. The current law contains unnecessary requirements creating barriers to effective enforcement.
  • Abolition of section 21 and depriving landlords of a ‘no-fault’ ground for eviction, increases the incentive for landlords to ‘take the law into their own hands’ and evict illegally or harass tenants with the intention of getting them to move out.
  • The cost-of-living crisis and spiraling rents has increased arrears. The backlog in the courts means that landlords may have to wait for a court order, and rather than risk being unable to meet their own financial commitments, may be tempted to break the law.

If introduced, the amendments set out in detail below would:

  • Provide one test for whoever is harassing a tenant to get them to leave, meaning that local authorities do not need to go through the complex task of working out whether or not the person accused of harassment was acting on behalf of the landlord or not;
  • Confirm that cutting access to the internet with the intention of making the occupier leave constitutes harassment;
  • Ensure that the legal protections extend as broadly as possible, by putting the onus on a landlord to show that a resident is not entitled to the protection in the legislation;
  • Simplify the law for enforcers by providing a rebuttable presumption that if you receive rent, you are the landlord – making it easier to prosecute rent-to-rent scams;
  • Ensure the police play a proper role in the enforcement of the law, by passing information they receive about potential offences to the relevant local authority;
  • Make the law on rent repayment orders (via the tribunal) and
    compensation for illegal eviction (via the courts) consistent, so that those who use the cheaper and speedier tribunal route are
    not discriminated against.

Effective law on illegal eviction and harassment, providing a basic floor of rights and deterring criminal behaviour by unscrupulous landlords is an essential part of a fair and well-functioning private rented sector.

The law must be clear, so that everyone understands their rights and responsibilities, and it must be straightforward for local authorities to enforce. The amendments complement the Renters’ Rights Bill providing a modern law fit for contemporary conditions.

Further valuable reforms could include: 

  • Introducing sentencing guidelines for offences under the Act to improve consistency and ensure appropriate sentences. This addresses anecdotal evidence that magistrates issue very low fines that fail to provide effective deterrents.
  • Ensuring that police training includes compulsory training on the Act and the need to support local authorities as prosecutors.
  • Strengthening the law on retaliatory eviction when eviction is threatened in connection with complaints to the local authority about potential offences under the Act.
  • Providing greater support from local authorities to enable tenants to pursue Rent Repayment Orders and civil claims.
  • Incentivising compliance from landlords, for example, giving landlords an easier way to obtain a determination that rent is owing through an expanded ‘rents’ jurisdiction in the First Tier Tribunal.

Detailed Amendments to the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 are set out in the report: Protecting Vulnerable Tenants: Reforming the law on protection from eviction (PDF, 862kB)

Authors

Professor Helen Carr, Professor Caroline Hunter, Dr Edward Kirton-Darling

Contact the researchers

Professor Helen Carr
University of Southampton
h.p.carr@soton.ac.uk

Professor Caroline Hunter
University of York
caroline.hunter@york.ac.uk

Dr Edward Kirton-Darling
University of Bristol
e.kirton-darling@bristol.ac.uk 

University of York logo

Edit this page